Who is Secualar/Sampradayik...Only one party or all

Sampradayik is derived from Sampradaya meaning "Sampradaya is a philosophy borne down through history by verbal transmission
. It is more inclusive than the related term parampara which names a living lineage of ordained gurus who embody and carry forth a sampradaya. A sampradaya may be represented by many paramparas."
It is wrong to connect Sampradayikta/secularism with a religion. What i mean by sampradaya is a group of people who folow same methodology. They can be of same location, of same age group, of same education background etc.....
The reason why different were made, to promote thoughts/ideas in a prominant way.
It is said that BJP in India is a secualr party, but does this question does not apply to all other parties. Are all other parties have in their manifesto that they are not highlighing any religion.
Lets go a bit deep on this and lets not keep only religion as a secular thing:
Is Congress, Left and all other kukurmutta parties like SP, BSP, DMK. AIADMK, AGP, LJP, MNS,SS and so on...does not potray that they have a soft cornor for a specific sampradaya? (Samprdaya is not only religion, it is Location, Guru, Belief and so on, do not attach it with a religious term)
Today home minister Mr. P Chidambram says that BJP is adding Afjal Guru as a secualar issue, now looking at the other side of the coin..... Whipppppppppp....Why he has not been given death sentence till now, while they were in power for last five years....Wnt you think making this type of remark by a home minister is being a bit secualar and Baking his bread (Rotiya sek rahe hai).... I am trying to look at the other side of the coin.

Another incident was, which i added in my last blog that, statement made my Mr Pranab Mukherji...that if he could speak hindi he could become PM...Is it not becoming secular in some way....becoming language specific or regional.

Khair yahi sab hai..which makes me to think..is this is real democracy??? Politians molding definitions and thoughts and trying to potray the things in their way...

Another is our Media.... Which says it is not biased but some how showing a wrong picture to the world....
There was a article on Times for 1-2 hours only that, A report came out on Gujarat roits which says that NGOs and Madam Teesta make it hype....And in that article there were doubts that whether all roit issue like rape of a pregnent lady, mob buring were really happend or not...
But i was surprised that in some time that article was removed and i was not able to find that article any where neither on TV or Net.
I do believe in non voilence and believe in being a good human rather than being a typed religious...and condemn those roits and any kind of blood voilence....but this is not fair to show wrong picture to world.

Another example, media is saying that BJP is raising RAM JANMBHUMI ISSUE again, and putting it in their manifesto..
I had not gone through any parties manifesto, but this is what the media said: " In manifesto BJP says that if court permits we will make temple their" (Let me clear, i am follower of to make a hospital or orphan house there, but the media again......), i dnt understand what is wrong in that....Is Congress is not going to follow the supreme court's decision..... Then why only BJP is secualr.....


These all parties are secular, my point here is to not Vote based on this assumption that some party is secular, and some party is not....The thing is
HAR SHAKH PE ULLU BAITHA HAI, NETA JI KI MANMAANI HAI
KURSI KE LIYE SAB MARTE HAI, KITNI YE VIKAT KAHANI HAI
KOI YE BOLE KOI WO BOLE, SABKA KHOON NAI HAI PAANI HAI
SAB SECULAR HAI SAB JUTHE HAI, FIR BI KEWAL bjp HI SHANI HAI
KUCH DESH KA SOCH LO NETA JI, YA YAHI SAB BAAT DOHRANI HAI